United States v. Griffin ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7711
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DIANNA BAKER GRIFFIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Rockingham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CR-94-23, CA-94-599-3)
Submitted: February 6, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dianna Baker Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-
trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Griffin, Nos.
CR-94-23; CA-94-599-3 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 1995). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2