Renoir v. Correctional Medical ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 99-6863
    PIERRE A. RENOIR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, Red Onion State
    Prison,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
    trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (MISC-99-49-7)
    Submitted:   August 19, 1999                 Decided:   August 26, 1999
    Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir-
    cuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Pierre A. Renoir, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Pierre A. Renoir sought a temporary restraining order prohib-
    iting Defendant from denying him medical treatment and attempting
    to harm him in retaliation for filing civil claims against it.   He
    now appeals the district court’s denial of a temporary restraining
    order and the further denial of preliminary injunctive relief.   To
    the extent that Renoir appeals from the court’s denial of a tempo-
    rary restraining order, that order is not appealable. See Virginia
    v. Tenneco, Inc., 
    538 F.2d 1026
    , 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976).    We have
    reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion denying
    preliminary injunctive relief and find no abuse of discretion. See
    Direx Israel, Ltd. v. Breakthrough Medical Corp., 
    952 F.2d 802
    ,
    812-13 (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
    the district court.   See Renoir v. Correctional Medical Services,
    No. MISC-99-49-7 (W.D. Va. June 9, 1999). We further deny Renoir’s
    motion to consolidate this appeal with Appeals No. 99-6698, 99-
    6596, 99-6722.   We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-6863

Filed Date: 8/26/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021