Timothy Davis v. Samuel I. White, P.C. , 685 F. App'x 178 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-1775
    TIMOTHY E. DAVIS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    UNIVERSAL COMPOSITION SERVICES, LLC; ALTAF U. KHAN,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00036-CMH-JFA)
    Submitted: March 30, 2017                                    Decided: April 12, 2017
    Before SHEDD and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Bernard E. Goodman, David Ludwig, DUNLAP BENNETT & LUDWIG, PLLC,
    Vienna, Virginia; Roger C. Simmons, Shawn P. Cavenee, Christopher F. deBettencourt,
    GORDON & SIMMONS, LLC, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellant. Mary C. Zinsner, S.
    Mohsin Reza, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Allison Melton,
    TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Lisa Hudson Kim, SAMUEL I.
    WHITE, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Timothy E. Davis appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his amended
    complaint in which he raised numerous claims arising out of the foreclosure on his
    property. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs,
    and find no error in the district court’s dismissal of Davis’ claims. Specifically, we find
    no merit to Davis’ claims asserting breach of fiduciary duty or breach of contract under
    Virginia law; nor do we find an actionable claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices
    Act, 
    15 U.S.C. § 1692
     (2012). Therefore we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court. Davis v. Samuel I. White, P.C., No. 1:16-cv-00036-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. June 10,
    2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1775

Citation Numbers: 685 F. App'x 178

Judges: Shedd, Wynn, Hamilton

Filed Date: 4/12/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024