Hyun Park v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 547 F. App'x 326 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-1409
    HYUN JUN PARK,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   November 15, 2013               Decided:   December 4, 2013
    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Scott E. Bratton, MARGARET WONG & ASSOCIATES, LPA, Cleveland,
    Ohio, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney
    General, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Ada E. Bosque,
    Senior Litigation Counsel, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Hyun Jun Park, a native and citizen of South Korea,
    petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals    (Board)   dismissing     his    appeal      from   the    Immigration
    Judge’s (IJ) decision denying his requests for withholding of
    removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture.                        We
    have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of
    Park’s merits hearing and his supporting evidence.                   We conclude
    that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to
    any   of   the   administrative     findings      of    fact,     see     8    U.S.C.
    § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports
    the   Board’s    decision   to   uphold     the    IJ’s    denial       of     Park’s
    applications for relief.         See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 
    502 U.S. 478
    , 481 (1992).      Accordingly, we deny the petition for review
    for the reasons stated by the Board.              See In re: Hyun Jun Park
    (B.I.A. Mar. 1, 2013).       We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials   before   this   court    and   argument       would     not       aid   the
    decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-1409

Citation Numbers: 547 F. App'x 326

Judges: Gregory, Duncan, Wynn

Filed Date: 12/4/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024