Ware v. Pruitt ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2290
OZIE M. WARE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RODNEY PRUITT; JUDGE FLYNN,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
J. E. PATSOURAKOS, Officer; OFFICER GRIFFIN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(1:09-cv-02360-MBS-JRM)
Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ozie M. Ware, Appellant Pro Se. Evan Markus Gessner, LIDE &
PAULEY, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ozie M. Ware seeks to appeal the district court order
dismissing his claims against two of the four Defendants named
in his law suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541
(1949). The order Ware seeks to appeal is neither a final order
nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2