-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-7603 JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY; SHERIFF ROGERS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:21-cv-00552-TDS-LPA) Submitted: March 24, 2022 Decided: April 11, 2022 Before AGEE and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jordan Nathaniel Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jordan Nathaniel Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Mitchell that failure to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v. Duffy,
858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins,
766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 154-55 (1985). Mitchell has waived appellate review by failing to file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Document Info
Docket Number: 21-7603
Filed Date: 4/11/2022
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/13/2022