Ewart Vandecruize v. Loretta Lynch ( 2015 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1085
EWART ULRIC VANDECRUIZE, a/k/a Ewart Vandercruize,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: June 30, 2015 Decided: July 8, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luis C. Diaz, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, Silver Spring,
Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Derek C. Julius, Senior Litigation
Counsel, Benjamin Mark Moss, Office of Immigration Litigation,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ewart Ulric Vandecruize, a native and citizen of Guyana,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. We have
reviewed the administrative record and Vandecruize’s claims and
find no abuse of discretion. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314,
323-24 (1992) (setting forth standard of review). Accordingly,
we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board. See In re: Vandecruize (B.I.A. Dec. 22, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2