Grubb v. Commissioner, SSA ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-1649
    JEAN E. GRUBB,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District
    Judge. (1:05-cv-00050-jpj)
    Submitted:   February 12, 2007         Decided:     February 27, 2007
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Joseph E. Wolfe, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant.         Donna L.
    Calvert, Regional Chief Counsel, William B. Reeser, Supervisory
    Regional Counsel, Lori Karimoto, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL
    SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L.
    Brownlee, United States Attorney, Sara Bugbee Winn, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jean   E.   Grubb   appeals    the   district     court’s    order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming
    the Commissioner’s decision to deny disability insurance benefits
    and supplemental social security benefits.           We must uphold the
    decision   to   deny   benefits   if   the   decision   is    supported    by
    substantial evidence and the correct law was applied.                  See 
    42 U.S.C. § 405
    (g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 
    76 F.3d 585
    , 589 (4th Cir.
    1996).   We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court.   See Grubb v. Commissioner, No. 1:05-cv-00050-jpj (W.D. Va.
    Apr. 17, 2006).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-1649

Filed Date: 2/27/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021