Don Wallace v. Enhanced Recovery Company ( 2016 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2194
DON BRADLEY WALLACE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (7:13-cv-00124-FL)
Submitted: April 28, 2016 Decided: June 21, 2016
Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Don Bradley Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Stephen Gallagher,
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP, Jacksonville, Florida, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Don Bradley Wallace appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint asserting claims under the
Telephone Consumer Protect Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (2012). * We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Schatz v.
Rosenberg, 943 F.2d 485, 487 n.1 (4th Cir. 1991) (“We must
review the district court’s decision on the same record as that
before the district court.”). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order, deny Wallace’s motions to supplement the
record on appeal, to seal some of those documents, and to
clarify, and deny the Appellee’s motion to strike portions of
Wallace’s opening brief. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid in the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Wallace abandoned in the district court the remaining
claims asserted in the complaint.
2