Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • USCA4 Appeal: 22-6169     Doc: 18         Filed: 07/17/2023    Pg: 1 of 3
    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 22-6169
    (CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN, FCI Beckley,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    No. 22-6170
    (CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN, FCI Beckley,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia,
    at Beckley. Frank W. Volk, District Judge. (5:21-cv-00367; 5:21-cv-00387, 5:21-cv-
    00492)
    Submitted: July 3, 2023                                          Decided: July 17, 2023
    USCA4 Appeal: 22-6169      Doc: 18         Filed: 07/17/2023    Pg: 2 of 3
    Before KING, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    USCA4 Appeal: 22-6169      Doc: 18         Filed: 07/17/2023     Pg: 3 of 3
    PER CURIAM:
    (Chief) Col. Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey appeals the district court’s orders
    accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge in part, dismissing his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     petitions without prejudice for failure to assert cognizable habeas claims, denying
    his motion for reconsideration, and imposing a pre-filing injunction. * We have reviewed
    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.
    See Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden, No. 5:21-cv-00367 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 4, 2022; Jan. 19,
    2022; Jan. 18, 2022; filed Nov. 17, 2021; entered Nov. 18, 2021). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    We deny a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. See Harbison v. Bell, 
    556 U.S. 180
    , 183 (2009); United States v. Williams, 
    56 F.4th 366
    , 370 n.3 (4th Cir. 2023).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-6169

Filed Date: 7/17/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/18/2023