McDHoldings, LLC v. Christian D'Andrade ( 2023 )

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1889 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/17/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1889
MCDHOLDINGS, LLC,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
and
MATTHEW MCDONALD,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHRISTIAN E. D’ANDRADE, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
EDWARD G. ROBINSON; EDWARD G. ROBINSON III CONSULTING, LLC;
CARLA DESILVA MCPHUN; CADEM CAPITAL GROUP; CHOICE
MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Defendants.
No. 21-1890
MCDHOLDINGS, LLC,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
and
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1889 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/17/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
MATTHEW MCDONALD,
Plaintiff,
v.
CARLA DESILVA MCPHUN,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
CHRISTIAN E. D’ANDRADE, SR.; EDWARD G. ROBINSON; EDWARD G.
ROBINSON III CONSULTING, LLC; CADEM CAPITAL GROUP; CHOICE
MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00697-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: January 30, 2023 Decided: July 17, 2023
Before GREGORY, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christian E. D’Andrade, Sr., Carla Desilva McPhun, Appellants Pro Se. Cathy Ann
Hinger, Jeffrey L. Tarkenton, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1889 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/17/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Christian E. D’Andrade, Sr., and Carla Desilva McPhun appeal the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting Plaintiffs’ motion
for default judgment on their 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), (d) claims, and assessing damages,
attorney’s fees, and costs against D’Andrade and McPhun. Appellants waived any
challenge to the award of attorney’s fees by failing to object to the magistrate judge’s
recommendation on that issue after being warned of the consequences of failure to object.
United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir. 2007). As to their remaining
claims, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. McDonald v. McPhun, No. 1:18-cv-00697-LMB-TCB (E.D.
Va. July 15, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3