Marys Paiz-De Delgado v. Merrick Garland ( 2023 )

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2300 Doc: 20 Filed: 12/29/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2300
MARYS PAIZ-DE DELGADO,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: October 18, 2023 Decided: December 29, 2023
Before AGEE and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
Maryland, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General,
Sabatino F. Leo, Assistant Director, Tatiana G. Pino, Office of Immigration Litigation,
Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2300 Doc: 20 Filed: 12/29/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Marys Paiz-De Delgado, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of
an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the Immigration
Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under
the Convention Against Torture. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and Paiz-De
Delgado’s claims, we conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any
of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial
evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Paiz-De Delgado (B.I.A. Nov. 22,
2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2