Kristin Schelin v. Karl Malloy ( 2024 )

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1201 Doc: 21 Filed: 08/27/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1201
KRISTIN E. SCHELIN; MARK A. WATSON,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
KARL L. MALLOY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00058-DJN)
Submitted: July 25, 2024 Decided: July 29, 2024
Amended: August 27, 2024
Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karl Linard Malloy, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Lawrence Perkins, ECKERT
SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1201 Doc: 21 Filed: 08/27/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Karl L. Malloy appeals the district court’s order dismissing as moot his appeal from
the bankruptcy court’s January 11, 2024, order denying his motion for a stay pending
appeal. The district court dismissed the appeal as moot because the bankruptcy court issued
a corrected order denying Malloy’s motion for a stay pending appeal and, in a separate
order, specifically stated that the corrected order “shall supersede and replace” the
January 11, 2024, order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Schelin v. Malloy, No. 3:24-cv-00058-
DJN (E.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2024); see Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F.3d 281, 286 (4th Cir. 2007)
(setting forth principles of appellate mootness). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2