Amada Crespo de Castro v. Merrick Garland ( 2023 )

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2213 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/15/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2213
AMADA MARLENE CRESPO DE CASTRO; D.M.C.C.; N.L.C.C.,
Petitioners,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted: September 19, 2023 Decided: November 15, 2023
Before AGEE, HEYTENS, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
Maryland, for Petitioners. Brian M. Boynton, Assistant Attorney General, Paul Fiorino,
Nancy E. Friedman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil
Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2213 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/15/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Amada Marlene Crespo de Castro and her minor children, natives and citizens of El
Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
dismissing Crespo de Castro’s appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of her
applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention
Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and Crespo de Castro’s claims
and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the
administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence
supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Crespo de Castro (B.I.A. Nov. 7,
2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2