Sirina Sucklal v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company ( 2014 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1729
SIRINA SUCKLAL,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY,
Creditor – Appellee,
NANCY SPENCER GRIGSBY,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:14-cv-00039-JFM)
Submitted: November 25, 2014 Decided: December 4, 2014
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sirina Sucklal, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Christopher Mullen,
MORRIS HARDWICK SCHNEIDER, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sirina Sucklal appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing as moot her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order
lifting the automatic stay and allowing the sale of her real
property. We have reviewed the record and find no error in the
bankruptcy court’s decision. See In re Frushour, 433 F.3d 393,
398 (4th Cir. 2005) (noting that, in an appeal from the district
court sitting as an appellate court from a bankruptcy court, we
“review directly the bankruptcy court’s decision”).
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2