United States v. Stacy Threatt ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • USCA4 Appeal: 24-6263      Doc: 5         Filed: 11/18/2024    Pg: 1 of 2
    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 24-6263
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    STACY ARTHANIEL THREATT,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
    Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:06-cr-00417-FDW-1)
    Submitted: November 14, 2024                                Decided: November 18, 2024
    Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Stacy Arthaniel Threatt, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    USCA4 Appeal: 24-6263      Doc: 5         Filed: 11/18/2024      Pg: 2 of 2
    PER CURIAM:
    Stacy Arthaniel Threatt appeals the district court’s order denying his second 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release, as amended and supplemented.
    Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion
    in determining that sentencing relief was not warranted. See United States v. Bethea, 
    54 F.4th 826
    , 831, 834 (4th Cir. 2022) (noting standard of review, determinations district court
    must make before granting motion, and guideposts for assessing whether district court has
    abused its discretion in considering 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a) factors). Specifically, the court
    accurately recounted Threatt’s arguments in favor of a reduction, explained its rationale
    for rejecting those arguments, and alternatively denied relief based on the § 3553(a) factors
    it deemed the most significant, to wit: the serious and violent nature of the underlying
    criminal conduct and Threatt’s extensive criminal history.
    Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Threatt, No. 3:06-
    cr-00417-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 4, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 24-6263

Filed Date: 11/18/2024

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/19/2024