United States v. Bobby Haislip ( 2024 )

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6489 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/19/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6489
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BOBBY WAYNE HAISLIP, a/k/a Roberto Wayne Haislip, a/k/a Robert Wayne
Haislip, a/k/a Roberto Fabian DeJesus,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Abingdon. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cr-00022-JPJ-PMS-1)
Submitted: November 14, 2024 Decided: November 19, 2024
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby Wayne Haislip, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Patrick Jones, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6489 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/19/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Bobby Wayne Haislip appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Part A of Amendment 821 to the
Sentencing Guidelines. We conclude that the district court correctly determined that
Haislip was ineligible for a sentence reduction. Haislip never received any “status
points”—that is, criminal history points for committing his offense while under a criminal
justice sentence. Rather, his criminal history score of six was based entirely on his past
criminal conduct. Accordingly, we deny Haislip’s motion for appointment of counsel and
affirm the district court’s judgment. United States v. Haislip, No. 1:21-cr-00022-JPJ-PMS-
1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2