Heidi Saas v. Major, Lindsey & Africa, LLC ( 2024 )

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1527 Doc: 18 Filed: 11/21/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1527
HEIDI SAAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MAJOR, LINDSEY & AFRICA, LLC; ALLEGIS GROUP, INC., Jointly and
Individually, as the owner of Major, Lindsey & Africa, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:23-cv-02102-JRR)
Submitted: November 19, 2024 Decided: November 21, 2024
Before QUATTLEBAUM, RUSHING, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Heidi Saas, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Catherine Biscoe-Hall, Kraig B. Long, Meredith A.
Storm, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1527 Doc: 18 Filed: 11/21/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Heidi Saas appeals the district court’s order construing Defendants’ motion to strike
her complaint or, in the alternative, to dismiss the complaint, as a motion to dismiss and
granting the motion as to Saas’ multiple civil claims, including her claims for disparate
treatment and disparate impact discrimination, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Saas v. Major, Lindsey
& Africa, LLC, No. 1:23-cv-02102-JRR (D. Md. May 10, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2