United States v. Alvin Gardner ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                      UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 19-4515
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ALVIN GARDNER,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
    Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cr-00194-1)
    Submitted: December 17, 2019                                Decided: December 19, 2019
    Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Wesley P. Page, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Assistant Federal Public
    Defender, Lorena E. Litten, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE
    FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. John Lanier
    File, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
    Beckley, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Alvin Gardner pled guilty, pursuant to a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea
    agreement, to distribution of oxymorphone, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (a)(1), (b)(1)(C)
    (2012), and the district court imposed a 151-month sentence pursuant to the agreement.
    Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967),
    stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but questioning whether Gardner’s
    sentence is unreasonable. The Government has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal
    pursuant to the appeal waiver in the plea agreement. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss
    in part and affirm in part.
    “The validity of a waiver of appeal . . . is reviewed de novo, and we will enforce the
    waiver if it is valid and the issue appealed is within the scope of the waiver.” United States
    v. Adams, 
    814 F.3d 178
    , 182 (4th Cir. 2016).            “In the absence of extraordinary
    circumstances, a properly conducted [Fed. R. Crim. P.] 11 colloquy establishes the validity
    of the waiver.” 
    Id.
    We have reviewed the plea agreement and the transcript of the Rule 11 hearing and
    conclude that Gardner knowingly and voluntarily pled guilty and waived his right to appeal
    his conviction and sentence. Because Gardner waived his right to appeal his sentence, and
    because his 151-month sentence falls within the range agreed upon by the parties in the
    plea agreement and is within the statutory maximum, we grant the Government’s motion
    in part and dismiss his appeal of his sentence. See 
    18 U.S.C. § 3742
    (c)(1) (2012).
    Pursuant to Anders, we have reviewed the entire record and have found no
    meritorious, nonwaived issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Gardner’s conviction. This
    2
    court requires that counsel inform Gardner, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme
    Court of the United States for further review. If Gardner requests that a petition be filed,
    but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this
    court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy
    thereof was served on Gardner.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED IN PART,
    AFFIRMED IN PART
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-4515

Filed Date: 12/19/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/19/2019