Richard Tisdale v. FBI ( 2019 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1829
RICHARD R. TISDALE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE;
UNITED STATES NAVY; NATIONAL AERONAUTICS SPACE
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
OYSTER POINT SELF-SERVICE STORAGE; BANK OF AMERICA;
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK; UNITED STATES,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00305-HEH-RCY)
Submitted: December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard R. Tisdale, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard R. Tisdale appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil
action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s informal
brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Tisdale’s informal brief does not challenge the basis
for the district court’s disposition, Tisdale has forfeited appellate review of the court’s
order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is
an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues
preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3