Charles Stephens v. Jefferson Sessions, III ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 15-60910      Document: 00513938174         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/04/2017
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 15-60910                                 FILED
    Summary Calendar                            April 4, 2017
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    CHARLES STEPHENS,
    Petitioner
    v.
    JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
    Respondent
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    BIA No. A038 541 554
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Charles Stephens is a native of Guyana and citizen of the United
    Kingdom who was ordered removed based on his commission of an aggravated
    felony.    He petitions this court for review of an order of the Board of
    Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying as untimely his motion to reconsider or
    reopen. He argues that the BIA erred by concluding that he was not entitled
    to equitable tolling.      He further argues that his prior counsel rendered
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-60910    Document: 00513938174     Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/04/2017
    No. 15-60910
    ineffective assistance by not arguing that his offense did not involve more than
    $10,000 because there is no indication that the district court made such a
    finding. The record undermines this assertion, as it shows that the district
    court adopted the presentence report, which found that the offense involved
    more than $10,000.
    Because Stephens was ordered removed based on his commission of an
    aggravated felony, and because his arguments concerning equitable tolling and
    ineffective assistance of counsel do not present substantial constitutional
    claims, we lack jurisdiction.   See 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    (a)(2)(C), (D); Assaad v.
    Ashcroft, 
    378 F.3d 471
    , 474-76 (5th Cir. 2004). The petition is, therefore,
    DISMISSED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-60910 Summary Calendar

Judges: Higginbotham, Prado, Haynes

Filed Date: 4/4/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024