Travis Blank v. Collin County ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 15-40733      Document: 00513931925         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/29/2017
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 15-40733                                FILED
    Summary Calendar                         March 29, 2017
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    TRAVIS HUNTER BLANK,
    Plaintiff-Appellant
    v.
    COLLIN COUNTY; TERRY BOX; RANDY CLARK; VICTOR HUTCHINSON;
    JOHN FERRELL; SHAWNA KING; CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
    MANAGEMENT,
    Defendants-Appellees
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:13-CV-519
    Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Travis Hunter Blank, federal prisoner # 16486-078, appeals the
    dismissal of his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Blank had 30 days from
    the entry of the March 30, 2015, judgment to file a timely notice of appeal. See
    FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Blank’s pro se notice of appeal, deemed filed on May
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-40733    Document: 00513931925     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/29/2017
    No. 15-40733
    14, 2015, the date he certified that he placed it in the prison mail system, is
    untimely. See id.; Spotville v. Cain, 
    149 F.3d 374
    , 378 (5th Cir. 1998).
    A district court may grant a defendant an additional 30 days in which to
    file a notice of appeal upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. See
    FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(5). Blank’s notice of appeal, which was filed within this
    additional 30-day period, sufficed as a motion under Rule 4(a)(5). See United
    States v. Golding, 
    739 F.2d 183
    , 184 (5th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, Blank’s
    appeal is held in abeyance, and the case is REMANDED to the district court
    for the limited purpose of issuing a ruling under Rule 4(a)(5). Upon ruling, the
    district court shall promptly return the case to this court for dismissal or
    further proceedings, as may be appropriate.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-40733 Summary Calendar

Judges: Davis, Higginson, Per Curiam, Southwick

Filed Date: 3/29/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024