Bank One NA v. Richardson ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                             United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   April 14, 2003
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    _______________________                     Clerk
    Consolidated Cases Nos. 02-60159, 02-60166,
    02-60204, 02-60206, 02-60213
    _______________________
    Case No. 02-60159
    BANK ONE NA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    TYRONE DAVIS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________
    Case No. 02-60166
    BANK ONE NA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    ROBERT BLACKMON,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________
    Case No. 02-60204
    BANK ONE NA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    LEADNER HACKETT,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________
    Case No. 02-60206
    BANK ONE NA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    GWENDOLYN DIXON,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________
    Case No. 02-60213
    BANK ONE NA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    ISSAC RICHARDSON, JR., also known as Issac Richardson,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________
    Appeals from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Mississippi
    (3:01-CV-74-WS)
    __________________________________________
    Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Appellants      challenge       the    district    court’s    rulings
    granting Bank One’s motions to compel arbitration and to stay the
    Appellants’     pending    state      law       claims.       This     case   is
    indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled on in the
    related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd1 and Bank One, N.A. v.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    1
    
    288 F.3d 181
     (5th Cir. 2002).
    2
    Lake.2   For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our
    opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in Bank One,
    N.A. v. Coates,3 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor,4 the judgments of the
    district court in these cases are, in all respects, AFFIRMED.
    2
    No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).
    3
    
    125 F. Supp. 2d 819
     (S.D. Miss. 2001).
    4
    No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order granting
    petition to compel arbitration).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-60213

Filed Date: 4/14/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014