United States v. Fleifel ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Case: 20-11195     Document: 00515918375         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/29/2021
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    June 29, 2021
    No. 20-11195
    Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Fabian C. Fleifel,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:12-CR-318-3
    Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Fabian C. Fleifel, federal prisoner # 57575-018, has appealed the
    district court’s order denying his untimely motion for reconsideration of its
    order denying his motion for compassionate release. The Government
    contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction, and it has moved to
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 20-11195     Document: 00515918375          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/29/2021
    No. 20-11195
    dismiss the appeal. The Government is correct that the district court lacked
    jurisdiction over Fleifel’s reconsideration motion given that he had appealed
    the underlying order denying compassionate release months before moving
    for reconsideration. See Griggs v. Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 
    459 U.S. 56
    ,
    58 (1982). However, in similar circumstances we have not dismissed the
    appeal but instead have affirmed on alternative jurisdictional grounds. See,
    e.g., United States v. Early, 
    27 F.3d 140
    , 142 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly,
    DENY the motion to dismiss the appeal, DISPENSE with further briefing,
    and AFFIRM the district court’s denial of reconsideration.
    The Government’s motion for an extension of time to file its brief is
    DENIED. Fleifel’s motions to consolidate this appeal with his appeal from
    the district court’s original order, in case number 20-10681, and for
    appointment of counsel are also DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-11195

Filed Date: 6/29/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/29/2021