United States v. Blanco ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Case: 19-40652      Document: 00515918512         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/29/2021
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                                 United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 19-40652                              June 29, 2021
    Conference Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Ines Simon Blanco,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:14-CR-173-2
    Before Graves, Willett, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    The attorney appointed to represent Ines Simon Blanco has moved for
    leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
    
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
     (5th Cir. 2011).
    Blanco has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-40652      Document: 00515918512           Page: 2    Date Filed: 06/29/2021
    No. 19-40652
    us to make a fair evaluation of Blanco’s claim of ineffective assistance of
    counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to
    collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 
    739 F.3d 829
    , 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
    His motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED as untimely.
    See United States v. Wagner, 
    158 F.3d 901
    , 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
    We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
    record reflected therein, as well as Blanco’s response. We concur with
    counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
    appellate review.     Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
    GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
    the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. His motion for a
    remand for resentencing is DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-40652

Filed Date: 6/29/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/29/2021