United States v. Moore ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 99-31133
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    CLIFTON DEWAYNE MOORE
    Defendant - Appellant
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 98-CR-10029-1
    --------------------
    June 23, 2000
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Clifton Dewayne Moore appeals from his sentence following a
    guilty plea to one count of possession of cocaine base with
    intent to distribute in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§841
    (a)(1) and
    841(b)(1)(A).**    Moore challenges the district court’s failure to
    apply both a three point reduction in sentence for acceptance of
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    **
    In addition to his sentence, Moore’s notice of appeal
    states that he appeals from the district court’s May 25, 1999
    denial of a motion to suppress. Moore has not briefed the motion
    to suppress issue, however, and it is therefore deemed abandoned.
    See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9)(A); Yohey v. Collins, 
    985 F.2d 222
    ,
    224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).
    No. 99-31133
    -2-
    responsibility and a two point reduction under the safety valve
    provision of the sentencing guidelines.   We affirm the district
    court’s sentence.   A review of the record and the testimony at
    the sentencing hearing shows that the district court did not err
    in concluding that Moore was not entitled to a reduction for
    acceptance of responsibility or under the safety valve provision.
    See United States v. Spires, 
    79 F.3d 464
    , 467 (5th Cir. 1996);
    United States v. Edwards, 
    65 F.3d 430
    , 432 (5th Cir. 1995).
    AFFIRMED.