United States v. Transito Villegas-Valdez , 429 F. App'x 427 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 10-20596     Document: 00511514581          Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/21/2011
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    June 21, 2011
    No. 10-20596
    Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    TRANSITO VILLEGAS-VALDEZ, also known as Transito Villegas, also known
    as Transito Villegas Valdez, also known as Transito Valdez Villegas, also known
    as Victor Villegas,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:10-CR-153-1
    Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Transito Villegas-Valdez pleaded guilty to being illegally present in the
    United States following deportation.            The district court imposed a below-
    guidelines sentence of 51 months in prison, taking into account the time
    Villegas-Valdez had served in state custody.                     Villegas-Valdez appeals,
    contending that the lack of a fast-track disposition program in the Houston
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
    R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-20596   Document: 00511514581     Page: 2    Date Filed: 06/21/2011
    No. 10-20596
    Division of the Southern District of Texas results in an unwarranted disparity
    between his sentence and the sentences of those convicted in divisions and
    districts having such programs. He maintains that such a disparity makes his
    sentence unreasonable.    As he concedes, his argument is foreclosed by our
    decision in United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 
    523 F.3d 554
    , 562-63 (5th Cir. 2008),
    and he raises it only to preserve it for further review.     Consequently, the
    judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-20596

Citation Numbers: 429 F. App'x 427

Judges: Jones, Stewart, Southwick

Filed Date: 6/21/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024