United States v. Bennette ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                                                               United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    December 12, 2005
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 05-40130
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    PARIS LYNN BENNETTE,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:04-CR-108-ALL
    --------------------
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges
    PER CURIAM:*
    Paris Lynn Bennette appeals his 162-month sentence following
    his guilty-plea conviction of possession with intent to distribute
    more than 5 grams but less than 50 grams of cocaine base.                     He
    argues that the district court erred in computing his criminal
    history category because it failed to consider certain prior
    convictions as “related” under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2.        He contends that
    the   sentences    in   those   cases   were   consolidated    because      the
    sentences were concurrent.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 05-40130
    -2-
    The prior sentences were based on separate convictions in
    cases that involved various types of crimes. These crimes involved
    independent arrests and were distinguished by different offense
    dates and cause numbers.   Thus, there is no basis to conclude that
    the prior sentences are “related” for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2.
    See United States v. Garcia, 
    962 F.2d 479
    , 482-83 (5th Cir. 1992),
    abrogated on other grounds by Buford v. United States, 
    532 U.S. 59
    (2001); United States v. Velazquez-Overa, 
    100 F.3d 418
    , 423-24 (5th
    Cir. 1996).   Bennette’s argument that Garcia and Velasquez-Overa
    were wrongly decided and should be overruled is unavailing.   We are
    bound by this court’s precedent on the issue.   See United States v.
    Ramirez-Velasquez, 
    322 F.3d 868
    , 876 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly,
    the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-40130

Judges: Higginbotham, Benavides, Dennis

Filed Date: 12/12/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024