United States v. De Alvarez ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-50060
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    LAURA MARQUEZ DE ALVAREZ,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. EP-01-CR-521-ALL-DB
    - - - - - - - - - -
    September 10, 2002
    Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Laura Marquez de Alvarez (Marquez) appeals her conviction
    for making a false statement regarding a matter within the
    jurisdiction of a government agency in violation of 18 U.S.C.
    § 1001.   While attempting to cross the border from Mexico,
    Marquez informed a United States Customs Service inspector that
    she owned the vehicle she was driving.   She later admitted that
    this statement was false.   Marquez contends that the evidence is
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-50060
    -2-
    insufficient to support her conviction because this statement was
    not material given that the customs inspector had already decided
    to conduct an intensive inspection of her vehicle prior to
    speaking with her.
    The customs inspector testified that he questions drivers
    and passengers at the border regarding the ownership of the
    vehicle they are in to determine whether they are familiar with
    the vehicle and its contents.   When the owner is not present,
    this raises his suspicions and influences his decision whether to
    inspect the vehicle, as well as the scrutiny with which he
    inspects a vehicle.   This evidence is sufficient to support the
    jury’s determination that the false statement regarding ownership
    of the vehicle was capable of influencing a decision within the
    jurisdiction of the United States Customs Service.   See United
    States v. Gaudin, 
    515 U.S. 506
    (1995); United States v. Puente,
    
    982 F.2d 156
    (5th Cir. 1993).
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-50060

Filed Date: 9/11/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014