Bignotte v. Chandler ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-40138
    Summary Calendar
    MIGUEL LOPEZ BIGNOTTE
    Petitioner - Appellant
    v.
    ERNEST CHANDLER, Warden; JOHN ASHCROFT, US ATTORNEY
    GENERAL
    Respondents - Appellees
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:01-CV-869
    --------------------
    July 30, 2002
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Petitioner Miguel Lopez Bignotte, immigration detainee
    # 02748-000, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his
    petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
    § 2241.   Bignotte, a Cuban national, arrived in the United States
    in 1980 with the Mariel boatlift.   Bignotte, together with the
    other Mariel Cubans, was determined by the Immigration and
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-40138
    -2-
    Naturalization Service (“INS”) to be excludable and was placed on
    immigration parole.    He has been detained in federal custody
    since 1987 following a state controlled-substance conviction.        He
    concedes that he has received regular parole review but has been
    denied release on account of his criminal history and
    disciplinary record.    Citing Zadvydas v. Davis, 
    533 U.S. 678
    (2001), Bignotte contends that his continued detention violates
    his constitutional rights.
    The district court did not err in determining that Bignotte
    is not entitled to relief.    See Gisbert v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 
    988 F.2d 1437
    , 1439 (5th Cir. 1993), amended by Gisbert v. U.S. Atty.
    Gen., 
    997 F.2d 1122
    (5th Cir. 1993).    Although Zadvydas held that
    a deportable alien may contest his continued detention in a 28
    U.S.C. § 2241 proceeding, the Court distinguished the status of
    deportable aliens from that of excludable aliens like Bignotte.
    See 
    Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 682
    , 692-94.      Bignotte’s petition is
    governed by Gisbert.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-40138

Filed Date: 7/31/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021