Vasquez v. Casarez ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                         United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS         October 29, 2003
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT             Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 03-40586
    Summary Calendar
    ALFREDO VASQUEZ,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    RENE CASAREZ,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. C-02-CV-565
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Alfredo Vasquez, Texas prisoner # 784866, filed a civil rights
    action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Rene Casarez, a prison
    employee.   Vasquez alleged that Casarez filed disciplinary charges
    against him in retaliation for a complaint Vasquez alleged against
    Casarez.    The district court, adopting the recommendations of a
    magistrate judge, dismissed Vasquez’s action on the grounds that he
    failed to properly exhaust administrative remedies before filing
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    suit.1    Specifically, the district court concluded that, although
    Vasquez administratively raised due process arguments, he never
    presented his claim of retaliation to the prison grievance process.
    Vasquez, however, alleged in his objections to the magistrate
    judge’s    recommendation   that   he   specifically   exhausted   his
    retaliation claims by filing the requisite forms in accordance with
    the grievance procedures established by the Texas Department of
    Criminal Justice.     Although he did not provide the court with
    copies of the forms, he nonetheless alleged with “sufficient
    specificity” that he exhausted his claims.2    Because the defendant
    presented no evidence disputing the plaintiff’s assertion, there
    does not appear to be a proper basis at this time for dismissal for
    failure to exhaust.     Accordingly, the judgment of the district
    court is VACATED, and Vasquez’s claims are REMANDED to the district
    court for further consideration.
    1
    42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2003) (“No action shall be brought with
    respect to prison conditions under section 1983 of this title, or
    any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison,
    or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies
    as are available are exhausted.”).
    2
    Underwood v. Wilson, 
    151 F.3d 292
    , 296 (5th Cir. 1998)
    (“Dismissal under § 1997e is made on pleadings without proof. As
    long as the plaintiff has alleged exhaustion with sufficient
    specificity, lack of admissible evidence in the record does not
    form the basis for dismissal.”).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-40586

Judges: Higginbotham, Davis, Prado

Filed Date: 10/29/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024