Garza-Garcia v. Mukasey , 293 F. App'x 282 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    September 17, 2008
    No. 07-60809
    Summary Calendar                Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    JUAN ANGEL GARZA-GARCIA,
    Petitioner
    v.
    MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL,
    Respondent
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    BIA No. A18-444-988
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Juan Angel Garza-Garcia (Garza) petitions this court for review of the
    order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the
    immigration judge’s order denying his application for a waiver of removability
    under former § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 
    8 U.S.C. § 1182
    (c). The BIA concluded that Garza was not eligible for a waiver because he
    was found removable as an aggravated felon as that term was defined in §
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 07-60809
    101(a)(43)(F) of the INA and because § 101(a)(43)(F) did not have a “comparable
    ground” of inadmissibility under § 212(a) of the INA.
    Garza argues that the BIA’s application of the comparable grounds test
    to deny him a § 212(c) waiver violates his right to equal protection because it
    treats him differently than other similarly situated aliens. This argument is
    foreclosed under the law of this circuit. See Vo v. Gonzales, 
    482 F.3d 363
    , 371-72
    (5th Cir. 2007).   Garza’s assertion that this court should adopt the equal
    protection analysis set forth by the Second Circuit in Blake v. Carbone, 
    489 F.3d 88
     (2d Cir. 2007), would require that Vo be overruled. “Absent an en banc or
    intervening Supreme Court decision, one panel of this court may not overrule a
    prior panel’s decision.” United States v. Rodriguez-Jaimes, 
    481 F.3d 283
    , 288
    (5th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-60809

Citation Numbers: 293 F. App'x 282

Judges: Higginbotham, Barksdale, Elrod

Filed Date: 9/17/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024