Roussel v. Bossier City ( 2003 )

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D August 7, 2003 In the Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit _______________ m 02-30965 _______________ CARL ROUSSEL AND LYN ROUSSEL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS MUNICIPALITY OF BOSSIER CITY; DAVID JONES; DON WILLIAMS; JEFFREY DARBY; P.O. DEPRANG; FAYE RAWLS; JAMES W. ROGERS, DR., Defendants-Appellees. _________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana m 99-CV-1551 _________________________ Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The plaintiffs bring various constitutional and state law claims regarding the denial of their applications to operate a sexually orient- ed business. After a bench trial, the district court concluded that the ordinance at issue was a valid time, place, and manner regulation, and entered judgment for defendants. We have read the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the ar- guments of counsel. On the basis of well set- tled law in this circuit and in the Supreme Court, the judgment is AFFIRMED, essential- ly for the reasons given by the district court. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be pub- lished and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 2