Bui Phu Xuan v. Fort Worth/Tarrant County Department of Health , 223 F. App'x 333 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                                                          United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 March 16, 2007
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 06-10418
    Summary Calendar
    BUI PHU XUAN, also known as Phi Xuan Bui,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    FORT WORTH/TARRANT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH; LOU K. BREWER,
    Director of Fort Worth/Tarrant County Health Department
    Defendants-Appellees.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:05-CV-370
    --------------------
    Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Bui Phan Xuan filed the instant 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     suit to
    seek redress for damages caused when he was falsely informed that
    he was HIV positive.    The district court determined that the suit
    was frivolous and/or failed to state a claim and dismissed it.
    Xuan appeals the dismissal of his suit.       He argues that his suit
    is timely, that his claims are valid, and that the district court
    erred by dismissing his suit prior to service upon the defendants
    and discovery.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 06-10418
    -2-
    Xuan has failed to show that the defendants infringed his
    constitutional rights.   See Shinn v. College Station Indep. Sch.
    Dist., 
    96 F.3d 783
    , 786 (5th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
    Consequently, the district court did not err by dismissing his
    suit.   See Johnson v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 
    38 F.3d 198
    , 200
    (5th Cir. 1994); see also Harper v. Showers, 
    174 F.3d 716
    , 719
    (5th Cir. 1999).   The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED,
    and Xuan’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-10418

Citation Numbers: 223 F. App'x 333

Judges: Demoss, Stewart, Prado

Filed Date: 3/16/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024