Quintana v. Doe ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                  IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 00-11183
    Summary Calendar
    RAFAEL MESA QUINTANA,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN DOE, Driver of Vehicle;
    DALE STORY, Director of
    Transportation,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:00-CV-179-R
    - - - - - - - - - -
    August 23, 2001
    Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Rafael Mesa Quintana, Texas prisoner # 482124, appeals the
    district court’s denial of his motion to proceed in forma
    pauperis (IFP) on appeal following the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.
    § 1983 action for failure to state a claim.    By moving for IFP
    status, Quintana is challenging the district court’s
    certification that IFP status should not be granted on appeal
    because his appeal is frivolous and is not taken in good faith.
    See Baugh v. Taylor, 
    117 F.3d 197
    , 202 (5th Cir. 1997).
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 00-11183
    -2-
    Quintana has failed to show that the claims that were
    dismissed present nonfrivolous issues for appeal.   Accordingly,
    the district court’s order certifying that the appeal is
    frivolous is upheld.   Quintana’s request for IFP status is
    DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous.    See 
    id. at 117
    F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a
    “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as does the
    district court’s dismissal.    See Adepegba v. Hammons, 
    103 F.3d 383
    , 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996).   Quintana is warned that if he
    accumulates one more “strike” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he
    may not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal
    filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless
    he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.     See 28
    U.S.C. § 1915(g).
    IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS WARNING
    ISSUED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-11183

Filed Date: 9/17/2001

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021