United States v. Wynn ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                   IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 00-11011
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    ERIC TIMOTHY WYNN,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:00-CR-35-2-H
    --------------------
    February 13, 2003
    Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Eric Timothy Wynn was convicted by a jury on two counts of
    violating the Hobbs Act counts and two corresponding counts of use
    or carrying of a firearm in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (c). Wynn
    argues   that    the   evidence   was   insufficient   to   establish    the
    requisite interstate commerce nexus to support his convictions
    under the Hobbs Act. Individual local crimes, with a slight effect
    on interstate commerce, may be prosecuted under the Hobbs Act “if
    the defendant’s conduct is of a general type which, viewed in the
    aggregate,      affects    interstate   commerce.”     United   States    v.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 00-11011
    -2-
    Robinson, 
    119 F.3d 1205
    , 1208 (5th Cir. 1997). There is sufficient
    evidence of   an   interstate   nexus   to    support   Wynn’s     Hobbs   Act
    convictions for robbery.
    Wynn   also   challenges   the     sufficiency     of   the    evidence
    supporting his conviction for aiding and abetting the use of a
    firearm during a crime of violence.          Wynn concedes that he aided
    and abetted the robbery of the Dairy Way store, but he asserts
    that aiding in the robbery does not show that he aided the use of
    the gun in committing the robbery.       Contrary to Wynn’s assertion,
    the evidence shows that he knew the gun would be used in the
    robbery and that he performed an act which facilitated the use of
    the gun during the robbery.     See United States v. Reyes, 
    102 F.3d 1361
    , 1363 (5th Cir. 1996); see also United States v. Sorrells, 
    145 F.3d 744
    , 753 (5th Cir. 1998).
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-11011

Filed Date: 2/14/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021