Bush v. Travelers Indemnity ( 1996 )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 95-50673
Summary Calendar
_____________
REBECCA BUSH
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
OF RHODE ISLAND,
CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,
KIRK LINDEMANN, and
SUSAN KING Defendants-Appellants
____________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
(SA-95-CV-321)
_____________________________
July 15, 1996
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Because the district court’s decision appears to be in conflict with this court’s recent decision
in Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc., 77 F.3d 782 (5th Cir.1996) and because the Patin opinion was
unavailable to the district court when it considered this case, the district court’s judgment is vacated
and the case is remanded to that court for its reconsideration in the light of our recent Patin decision
and, if necessary, for its consideration of the additional issues pretermitted by its original decision.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
1