United States v. Beltran-Del Moro ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS          April 23, 2003
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 02-51002
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    GUSTAVO BELTRAN-DEL MORO,
    also known as Rigoberto Del Moro,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. EP-02-CR-896-ALL-PRM
    --------------------
    Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Gustavo Beltran-Del Moro appeals his guilty plea conviction
    and sentence for being found in the United States after
    deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.     He contends
    that the district court erred in determining that his prior state
    felony conviction for possession of cocaine was a “drug
    trafficking” crime and thus an “aggravated felony” which
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-51002
    -2-
    warranted an eight-level increase in his base offense level under
    U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C)(2001).
    Beltran-Del Moro’s argument is foreclosed by United States
    v. Caicedo-Cuero, 
    312 F.3d 697
    , 706-11 (5th Cir. 2002), petition
    for cert. filed, (U.S. March 19, 2003)(No. 02-9747), which held
    that simple possession of a controlled substance is a drug
    trafficking crime for purposes of the aggravated felony
    enhancement in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C)(2001).    Because Beltran-
    Del Moro’s argument is foreclosed, the Government has moved for a
    summary affirmance.   It asks that an appellee’s brief not be
    required.   The motion is GRANTED.   The judgment of the district
    court is AFFIRMED.
    MOTION GRANTED; AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-51002

Filed Date: 4/23/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014