Bank One NA v. Hawkins ( 2003 )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
Consolidated Cases Nos. 02-60404, 02-60411,
02-60419, 02-60457, 02-60458, 02-60481,
02-60517, 02-60536
Summary Calendar
_______________________
Case No. 02-60404
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JESSE WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60411
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SUSIE GEORGE,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60419
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LINDA HAWKINS,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60457
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CURRY JOE ATTERBURY,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60458
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RUBIN ASHFORD,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60481
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MARY BURT,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60517
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
L.D. TAYLOR, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60536
BANK ONE NA,
2
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MARY McMORRIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
_____________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
(3:01-CV-24-D)
_____________________________________________
January 29, 2003
Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellants challenge the district court’s rulings
granting Bank One’s motions to compel arbitration and to stay the
Appellants’ pending state law claims. This case is
indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled on in the
related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd1 and Bank One, N.A. v.
Lake.2 For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our
opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in Bank One,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002).
2
No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).
3
N.A. v. Coates,3 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor,4 the judgment of the
district court in this case is, in all respects, AFFIRMED.
3
125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001).
4
No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order granting petition to compel
arbitration).
4