Johnson v. Whitley ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                      IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 96-30814
    Summary Calendar
    HERMAN JOHNSON, JR.,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN P. WHITLEY, Warden,
    Louisiana State Penitentiary;
    RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney General,
    State of Louisiana,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 94-CV-3980-E
    - - - - - - - - - -
    December 19, 1996
    Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Herman Johnson, Jr., Louisiana state prisoner #121967,
    appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for
    writ of habeas corpus.              He has filed a motion with this court to
    proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal.                        This court must examine the
    basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 
    813 F.2d 659
    , 660 (5th
    *
    Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
    47.5.4.
    No. 96-30814
    - 2 -
    Cir. 1987). Johnson did not file a notice of appeal from the district court’s denial of his habeas
    petition. Although he refiled his original § 2254 petition one year after the court’s judgment, his
    habeas petition is ineffective to serve as a notice of appeal
    because it did not “clearly evince an intent to appeal.”                                    See id.
    To the extent that any documents subsequently filed by Johnson evince an intent to appeal, they
    are untimely as they were filed more than thirty days after the district court’s entry of final
    judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite for the
    exercise of jurisdiction by this court. United States v. Carr, 
    979 F.2d 51
    , 55 (5th Cir. 1992).
    Because Johnson did not file a timely notice of appeal, this court lacks appellate jurisdiction.
    Johnson’s motion for IFP is therefore DENIED as unnecessary and his appeal is DISMISSED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-30814

Filed Date: 1/7/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014