United States v. Jones , 214 F. App'x 482 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 January 24, 2007
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 06-30421
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    ROY J. JONES, JR.,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 6:05-CR-60046-1
    --------------------
    Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Roy J. Jones, Jr. appeals the sentence imposed by the
    district court following his guilty-plea conviction for being a
    felon in possession of a firearm.   See 
    18 U.S.C. § 922
    (g)(1).
    Jones argues that the district court erred in increasing his
    offense level by four levels under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) for
    possessing the firearm in connection with the felony offense of
    cocaine possession.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 06-30421
    -2-
    Jones first asserts that the district court clearly erred in
    finding that he possessed cocaine.   Based on the record as a
    whole, the district court’s finding that Jones possessed cocaine
    was plausible and therefore not clearly erroneous.   See United
    States v. Condren, 
    18 F.3d 1190
    , 1199 (5th Cir. 1994).
    Jones also argues that § 2K2.1(b)(5) is inapplicable to his
    case because his firearm possession did not occur in connection
    with the cocaine possession.   The district court did not err in
    its application of § 2K2.1(b)(5) to Jones’s case.    See United
    States v. Armstead, 
    114 F.3d 504
    , 512 (5th Cir. 1997); Condren,
    
    18 F.3d at 1199-1200
    .
    Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-30421

Citation Numbers: 214 F. App'x 482

Judges: Demoss, Stewart, Prado

Filed Date: 1/24/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024