United States v. Bounds ( 1998 )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-30447
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DEBORAH RICHARDSON BOUNDS,
Defendant-Appellant.
_____________________
No. 97-30450
Conference Calendar
______________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANNY ROYCE BRAZIEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC Nos. CR-88-50038-01, CR-88-50038-03
- - - - - - - - - -
April 10, 1998
Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Nos. 97-30447 & 97-30450
- 2 -
Deborah Richardson Bounds, federal prisoner number 18364-
077, and Danny Royce Braziel, federal prisoner number 18365-077,
appeal from the district court’s denial of their motions for
modification of the imposed term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2). Bounds moves this court to recognize that a
certificate of appealability is not required and to allow her to
adopt her coappellant's brief. These motions are GRANTED.
Appellants argue that the district court should have applied
retroactively Amendment 484 to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, clarifying what
materials must be excluded from controlled substances in
calculating the weight at sentencing. Because Bounds and Braziel
were sentenced on the size and capability of the clandestine
methamphetamine laboratory, Amendment 484 does not apply to their
situation. United States v. Allison, 63 F.3d 350, 353 (5th Cir.
1995).
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
the § 3582(c)(2) motions. These appeals are without arguable
merit and thus frivolous; they are DISMISSED without further
briefing. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2; Clark v. Williams, 693 F.2d 381,
382 (5th Cir. 1982).
MOTIONS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.