United States v. Fuentes-Gomez ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    August 18, 2009
    No. 08-41297
    Conference Calendar                  Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    MARGARITA DEL ROSARIO FUENTES-GOMEZ, also known as Margarita
    Torres,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 7:08-CR-1191-1
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Margarita Del Rosario Fuentes-Gomez (Fuentes) pleaded guilty to one
    count of illegal reentry after deportation following a felony conviction in violation
    of 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
    (a) and (b). She appeals her within-guidelines sentence of 37
    months of imprisonment, arguing that the sentence is procedurally unreasonable
    because the district court failed to provide adequate reasons to explain its choice
    of sentence.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 08-41297
    As Fuentes failed to object at sentencing, this court reviews for plain error.
    See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 
    564 F.3d 357
    , 361 (5th Cir. 2009),
    petition for cert. filed (June 24, 2009) (No. 08-11099). To demonstrate plain
    error, Fuentes must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and affects her
    substantial rights. See 
    id.
     If these conditions are met, this court may exercise
    its discretion to correct the error if it “seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or
    public reputation of judicial proceedings.” 
    Id.
     (citation omitted).
    As Fuentes concedes, there is nothing in the record to indicate that
    Fuentes’s sentence would have been different if the court had provided more
    explanation for its choice of sentence. Fuentes has thus failed to demonstrate
    error affecting her substantial rights. See 
    id. at 364-65
    .
    Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-41297

Judges: Higginbotham, Davis, Clement

Filed Date: 8/18/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024