Estrella v. United States ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 00-50425
    Summary Calendar
    SULEMA C. ESTRELLA;
    JOSE ESTRELLA, III,
    Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. SA-99-CV-1000-FB
    --------------------
    December 13, 2000
    Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    The Estrellas appeal the district court’s grant of summary
    judgment to the defendants in this Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)
    case.      They    first    argue   that   the   district     court   erred   in
    determining       that   their    claim   was   barred   by   the   statute   of
    limitations.      The district court’s determination on this issue was
    not erroneous, as the Estrellas failed to timely present their
    administrative claim to the appropriate agency.               See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2401
    (b).
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 00-50425
    -2-
    The Estrellas next argue that the district court erred in
    determining that Dr. Washington was a Government employee for FTCA
    purposes.    The district court did not err, as Washington falls
    under the provisions of 
    42 U.S.C. § 233
    (g).            The Estrellas’ final
    argument    is   that   the   case   should   have   been   remanded.   This
    contention is not meritorious.           The case was properly removed
    pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 2679
    (d)(2).           The Estrellas have failed to
    show that the district court erred in denying their motion to
    remand and granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
    Consequently, the judgment of the lower court is AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-50425

Filed Date: 12/13/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021