Reyes-Reyes v. Holder ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    September 4, 2009
    No. 08-60793
    Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    CRISTIAN ELMER REYES-REYES
    Petitioner
    v.
    ERIC H HOLDER JR, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
    Respondent
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    BIA No. A99-676-754
    Before KING, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Having conceded removability, Cristian Elmer Reyes-Reyes, a citizen of
    Guatemala, seeks review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals
    (BIA) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief
    under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The BIA’s factual findings are
    reviewed under the substantial-evidence standard. E.g., Mikhael v. INS, 115
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 08-
    60793 F.3d 299
    , 302 (5th Cir. 1997). Under that standard, “[t]he applicant has the
    burden of showing that the evidence is so compelling that no reasonable
    factfinder could reach a contrary conclusion”. Chen v. Gonzales, 
    470 F.3d 1131
    ,
    1134 (5th Cir. 2006) (citing Zhao v. Gonzales, 
    404 F.3d 295
    , 306 (5th Cir. 2005)).
    Among other things, Reyes has not demonstrated that he is a member of
    any particular social group. See Mwembie v. Gonzales, 
    443 F.3d 405
    , 414-15 (5th
    Cir. 2006); Sanchez-Trujillo v. INS, 
    801 F.2d 1571
    , 1576-77 (9th Cir. 1986).
    Arguably, he has failed to adequately brief this factor. In any event, the BIA’s
    denial of asylum and withholding of removal was supported by substantial
    evidence. Mwembie, 
    443 F.3d at 414-15
    .
    Reyes also fails to establish past torture or a probability of future torture
    upon his return to Guatemala. Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the
    BIA’s denial of relief under the CAT. See Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft, 
    303 F.3d 341
    , 353-55 (5th Cir. 2002).
    DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-60793

Judges: King, Barksdale, Garza

Filed Date: 9/4/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024