De La Torre v. Tombone ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-40668
    Conference Calendar
    RAUL DE LA TORRE,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN TOMBONE, Warden,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:02-CV-84
    --------------------
    October 29, 2002
    Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Raul De La Torre, federal prisoner # 30738-077, appeals the
    district court’s dismissal of his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     petition
    challenging his 300-month sentence for conspiracy to possess over
    1,000 kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute and money
    laundering.    He asserts that his guilty plea was involuntary and
    that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by allowing De
    La Torre to plead guilty without understanding the consequences
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-40668
    -2-
    of the plea, by misrepresenting the consequences of the plea, and
    by not advising De La Torre of his appellate rights.
    In order to raise this challenge to the validity of his
    conviction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
    , De La Torre must show that 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     provides an inadequate or ineffective remedy.    Pack
    v. Yusuff, 
    218 F.3d 448
    , 452 (5th Cir. 2000).   He has not shown
    that his claims are based on a retroactively applicable Supreme
    Court decision establishing that he may have been convicted of a
    nonexistent offense or that his claims were foreclosed by circuit
    law at the time that he filed his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     motion.     See
    Henderson v. Haro, 
    282 F.3d 862
    , 863 (5th Cir. 2002).
    Consequently, the district court’s dismissal of De La Torre’s 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     petition is AFFIRMED.
    De La Torre has moved for appointment of counsel on appeal.
    This motion is DENIED.   See Schwander v. Blackburn, 
    750 F.2d 494
    ,
    502 (5th Cir. 1985).
    AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-40668

Filed Date: 10/29/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014