Keynel Knight v. Burl Cain, Warden ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 10-31185     Document: 00511712999         Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/04/2012
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    January 4, 2012
    No. 10-31185
    Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    KEYNEL KNIGHT,
    Petitioner-Appellant
    v.
    BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY,
    Respondent-Appellee
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 2:08-CV-4721
    Before WIENER, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Petitioner-Appellant Keynel Knight, Louisiana prisoner # 483673, appeals
    the dismissal of his application for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 2004
    conviction of second degree murder. Knight contends that trial counsel rendered
    ineffective assistance by interfering with his right to testify in his own behalf at
    trial, and that the federal district court erred in failing to develop the record as
    to this issue.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-31185   Document: 00511712999      Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/04/2012
    No. 10-31185
    As Knight’s ineffective-assistance claim was adjudicated by the state court
    on its merits, the district court’s review was limited to the record before the state
    court. See Cullen v. Pinholster, 
    131 S. Ct. 1388
    , 1398-1402 (2011). Knight’s
    conclusional and self-serving contentions in the state court are insufficient to
    carry his burden of showing that the state court’s rejection of this claim was
    contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established
    Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States, or that
    it resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the
    facts in light of the evidence presented. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
    (d). The judgment
    is
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-31185

Judges: Wiener, Clement, Southwick

Filed Date: 1/4/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024