Cervantes v. Barnhart , 110 F. App'x 424 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  October 14, 2004
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-40301
    Summary Calendar
    NORMA E. FERGUSON CERVANTES,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. C-03-CV-41
    --------------------
    Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Norma E. Ferguson Cervantes appeals the district court’s
    judgment dismissing her complaint and affirming the
    Commissioner’s decision denying her claim for Social Security
    disability insurance benefits.    Cervantes argues that the
    administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erred by failing to consider the
    combined effects of her impairments and by discounting the
    opinion of Dr. Childers.    Cervantes challenges the ALJ’s
    determination that she had the residual functional capacity to
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 04-40301
    -2-
    perform a broad range of light exertional work.    Cervantes also
    makes arguments related to the appropriate onset date for her
    mental disability.
    The record shows that the ALJ considered Cervantes’s
    physical and mental impairments when making his disability
    determination.   See Loza v. Apfel, 
    219 F.3d 378
    , 393 (5th Cir.
    2000).   The record also supports the ALJ’s decision to afford
    little weight to Dr. Childers’s opinion.    See 
    20 CFR § 404.1527
    .
    The ALJ’s determination that Cervantes has the residual
    functional capacity to perform a significant range of light work
    is supported by substantial evidence.     See Leggett v. Chater,
    
    67 F.3d 558
    , 564 (5th Cir. 1995).   Because the ALJ’s
    determination that Cervantes is not disabled is supported by
    substantial evidence, we do not reach her arguments concerning
    the onset date of her mental disability.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-40301

Citation Numbers: 110 F. App'x 424

Judges: Davis, Dennis, Per Curiam, Smith

Filed Date: 10/14/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023