Farmers Grain v. Holly Ridge Rice ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •        UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 96-30869
    FARMERS GRAIN TERMINAL, INC.,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    VERSUS
    HOLLY RIDGE RICE & GRAIN TERMINAL,
    Defendant,
    BUDDY McINTYRE; BARBARA McINTYRE,
    Defendants-Appellants.
    HOLLY RIDGE RICE & GRAIN TERMINAL,
    Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant
    VERSUS
    MUTUAL SERVICE CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.,
    Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    For the Western District of Louisiana
    (94-CV-508)
    June 17, 1997
    Before EMILIO M. GARZA, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Having   carefully   reviewed   the    record   and   the   parties’
    arguments concerning their contract dispute and the damages as
    awarded by the magistrate judge, we find no reversible error and
    AFFIRM the district court for essentially the reasons stated in the
    magistrate’s opinion.      We have also considered the third-party
    insurance coverage issue and finding no error, AFFIRM the district
    court as to that issue as well.
    DENNIS, Circuit Judge, dissenting:
    I respectfully dissent.   From my reading of the record, I
    believe that it is clear that there was no meeting of the minds
    of the parties because they did not intend to be bound until the
    contract was executed in written form.       No such written contract
    was ever executed by the parties.     When, in the absence of a
    legal requirement, the parties have contemplated a certain form,
    it is presumed that they do not intend to be bound until the
    contract is executed in that form.     La.Civ.Code art. 1947 (West
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    1987).   See, e.g., Laroussini v. Werlein, 52 La.Ann. 424, 
    27 So. 89
    (1899); see also Breaux Brothers Const. Co. v. Associated
    Contractors, Inc., 
    226 La. 720
    , 
    77 So. 2d 17
    (1954); Waldhauser v.
    Adams Hats, 
    207 La. 56
    , 
    20 So. 2d 423
    , (1944); Knipmeyer v.
    Diocese of Alexandria, 
    492 So. 2d 550
    , 555 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1986),
    writ denied, 
    496 So. 2d 347
    (La. 1987).