Burks v. Chandler ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-40377
    Conference Calendar
    DOUGLAS WAYNE BURKS,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    versus
    ERNEST CHANDLER,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:02-CV-40
    --------------------
    December 11, 2002
    Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Douglas Wayne Burks, federal inmate #83737-079, appeals the
    district court’s dismissal of his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     petition.
    Burks was convicted on a guilty plea of possession with intent to
    distribute cocaine base and was sentenced to 120 months’
    imprisonment and five years’ supervised release.
    Burks reiterates the challenges to his conviction that he
    asserted in the district court.   We review the district court’s
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-40377
    -2-
    legal conclusions de novo.    Jeffers v. Chandler, 
    253 F.3d 827
    ,
    830 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    122 S. Ct. 476
     (2001).    The
    district court may entertain a 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     petition that
    challenges custody resulting from a federal sentence if the
    petitioner satisfies the requirements of the 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
    “savings clause.”   Jeffers, 
    253 F.3d at 830
    .    To do so, a
    petitioner must show first that his claim is based “‘on a
    retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes
    that the petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent
    offense.’”   
    Id.
     (citation omitted).
    Burks has not identified a retroactively applicable Supreme
    Court decision upon which he relies.    
    Id.
       Accordingly, Burks has
    not made the showing required to proceed under the savings clause
    of 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
    .   Jeffers, 
    253 F.3d at 830, 831
    .    The
    judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-40377

Filed Date: 12/11/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021